Uber’s chief government, Dara Khosrowshahi, thanked motorists for the acquire in a late-night email. “The future of unbiased function is a lot more safe due to the fact so a lot of motorists like you spoke up,” he wrote. He mentioned Uber would make the new advantages promised by Prop. 22 accessible “as shortly as achievable.”
“The very last 14 months in California have been the most critical stage on this problem,” claimed Bradley Tusk, a enterprise capitalist who suggested Uber on political difficulties throughout its early years. Emboldened by the election, Uber and other gig financial system gamers will possible pursue federal laws to formally enshrine gig work in the nation’s labor guidelines.
The passage of Prop. 22 is a bitter decline for point out and area officials who have long observed the experience-hailing companies as obstinate upstarts that shrugged off any hard work to make them comply with the policies.
Lots of nearby officials considered California was also gentle for as well prolonged when it arrived to regulating Uber and Lyft and naïve about how powerful and influential the journey-hailing providers would rapidly turn into.
“For all much too very long, Uber and Lyft banked on the timidity of general public officers all through the state,” claimed Dennis Herrera, the metropolis lawyer of San Francisco. Mr. Herrera has sued Uber and Lyft in an try to force them to make use of their drivers, and the litigation proceeds. “They explained, ‘We’re not likely to talk to permission, we’ll form of check with for forgiveness right after the truth, once the horse has remaining the barn.’”
Uber and Lyft introduced in the early 2010s with just a handful of motorists, resembling car or truck pool solutions more than skilled fleets. Though Uber initially tried to mimic black auto expert services, it immediately joined Lyft in advertising the idea that drivers had been drawn to the applications by the novelty of gig function somewhat than the assure of standard work.
Transit officers and taxi companies warned that the drivers lacked experienced certification and have been not subjected to background checks. Uber and Lyft argued that they ended up generally technological innovation organizations, not transportation businesses, and should really not be forced into the burdensome needs of licensing, basic safety checks and employment. The California General public Utilities Commission stepped in, setting baseline protection specifications but allowing for Uber and Lyft to prevent hiring drivers.